Jensen vs Ezra on AI pacing: maybe they're just talking past each other
ShakeelHashim · x · 2026-09-24
Commenting on the Jensen Huang–Ezra Klein exchange, ShakeelHashim argues the two may simply be talking past each other due to different worldviews and alliances: what Jensen is calling for sounds a lot like what AI companies mean by "pacing". Citing Ezra, he notes AI safety people would actually be quite happy with this outcome — suggesting the accelerationist vs. safety framing may mask substantial overlap on regulation tempo.
More from AGI Musings
- MIT's Buehler builds "recursive meta-intelligence": hundreds of AI agents inhabit self-created worlds to study material failure — ProfBuehlerMIT · 2026-11-11
- AI timeline forecasters' odds revealed: TED-AI medians cluster in 2027-2028, p by EO2027 up to 65% — davidmanheim · 2026-11-11
- Not Boring: the three arguments that AI isn't a bubble are exactly how bubbles form — Not Boring (Packy McCormick) · 2026-11-11
- Viral post: five years of 'maybe next year,' then 2026 arrived — hey_abusiddik · 2026-11-11
- Jeremy Howard: LLMs "cosplay understanding," like the man in Searle's Chinese room — Machine Learning Street Talk · 2026-11-11
- 'Chat with your data' misses the point — people want a smart coworker — vboykis · 2026-11-11