Screenshot-annotated web edits tested with Ling-3.0: only 2 of 3 runs passed

alifcoder · x · 2026-09-24

The author tested Ant Group's Ling-3.0-flash-VL on editing an event signup page from annotated screenshots — red circles, arrows and boxes marking the changes, passed along with the source code. Across three runs of the same task, the first version misplaced the button every time; after feeding back screenshots of the actual rendered page, two runs passed all 17 acceptance checks in one round, for a final 2/3 success rate.

The checklist covered text preservation, dialogs, FAQ expansion, mobile overflow and console errors, not just layout. Switching the target to a different card still failed, so full-page edits can't yet be left unattended. Reusable workflow: annotate the screenshot, feed back rendered pages when the first pass fails, and explicitly state what must be preserved.

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →