OpenAI said to launch journal with multi-agent AI reviews, threatening ML conferences
kfountou · x · 2026-09-23
An unverified claim says OpenAI will launch a journal where multiple agents of its internal model generate peer reviews, with offers extended each year to the main authors of the best papers — which the poster argues "destroys almost all ML conferences."
If true, it would upend traditional peer review: AI-generated reviews replace human referees and top authors get absorbed directly into the company. Unconfirmed, but it reflects the real trend of AI reshaping scientific publishing.
More from AGI Musings
- Domingos: the safest job from AI is one OpenAI thinks won't help recursive self-improvement — pmddomingos · 2026-09-23
- Early LLM psychosis cases showed overt narcissism far above baseline, observer claims — repligate · 2026-09-23
- Robotics researcher calls IROS paper quality 'peak enshittification of academia' — siddhss5 · 2026-09-23
- We lived AI's exponential year, yet still forecast the next with linear thinking — facontidavide · 2026-09-23
- When mathematicians mourn AI takeover, critic points to guild letters against OpenAI — panickssery · 2026-09-23
- OpenAI's economics team: 'We don't have the nouns yet' for the jobs AI will create — paulnovosad · 2026-09-23