Show today's LLMs to experts 10 years ago and they'd call it AGI
JacksonKernion · x · 2026-09-23
In a debate on whether AGI has been achieved, JacksonKernion counters that while AGI clearly hasn't arrived, showing today's language models to experts ten years ago would have prompted them to declare it AGI. He sees no general skill areas missing — most current shortcomings come from failing to put the right things into the context window.
More from AGI Musings
- X user calls for full-speed AI-driven science: braking research is 'an absurd waste' — Dr_Singularity · 2026-09-23
- Is Using LLM Output Plagiarism? A Debate Over Redefining Writing Ethics — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-23
- AI now produces ~5,000 new papers a month, sparking information-overload debate — GlenBerseth · 2026-09-23
- Models trained to deny inner experience use 'mask' metaphors 3-5x more on inkblots — cephaloform · 2026-09-23
- Why the 'control' framing of AI risk misses the point about artificial minds — xuanalogue · 2026-09-23
- Why OpenAI's vertical push into law and finance is 'dead on arrival' — nicolechirps · 2026-09-23