EA debate: is total impartiality a moral imperative or madness?
tracewoodgrains · x · 2026-09-23
- In a debate with NathanpmYoung, tracewoodgrains clarifies he isn't refusing to help more people — he argues helping should be grounded in partiality toward essential relations, and that making total impartiality a core moral principle is wrong.
- He distinguishes the shape of morality from moment-to-moment moral practice: "move some steps towards impartiality, feel the challenge, sacrifice a little" is good; "be totally impartial" is madness.
- His counterpart concedes EA largely sidesteps these questions, and argues its maximization articles still treat impartiality as fundamentally correct, burying the real moral questions in footnotes.
Related event: EA Community Debates Whether Impartial Altruism Is a Moral Requirement(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Garry Tan: Teach the world to prompt — AI education mirrors MIT's first EE curriculum in 1882 — garrytan · 2026-09-23
- Pedro Domingos: the days when a mathematician needed only pen and paper are long gone — pmddomingos · 2026-09-23
- French Publisher Dismisses Evidence Its Prize-Winning Bestseller Is AI-Generated — Afinetheorem · 2026-09-23
- Richard Socher publishes 'The Eureka Machine' and founds Recursive_SI to build AI scientists — RichardSocher · 2026-09-23
- Schmidhuber: self-driving cars since 1994 still unsolved — physical AI is a slow game — SchmidhuberAI · 2026-09-23
- Why AI progress accelerated: Claude 4.5 kicked off narrow RSI and open-weight catch-up — maksym_andr · 2026-09-23