Do high-volume PIs review proportionally? Skepticism on NeurIPS reciprocal reviewing
3scorciav · x · 2026-09-22
A researcher questions reciprocal reviewing at major AI conferences: submission caps partly exist to prevent review burden from high-volume senior researchers spilling onto others, but a PI allowed up to 25 submissions may not be reviewing proportionally. They ask for statistics on the matter.
More from Research
- Google's ScientistTwo solves 80.4% of 107 top-venue ML problems autonomously — thisdudelikesAI · 2026-09-22
- Tencent Hunyuan's WebCraftBench tests web apps like software, matching human preference 85.3% — TencentHunyuan · 2026-09-22
- Sarah Hooker proposes $1 paper submission fee to stress-test auto research agents — MannyKayy · 2026-09-22
- OpenAI's new model reportedly solved 100+ open math problems in 24 days of training — BilelKort · 2026-09-22
- Boltzbit previews paper claiming BAST lets LLMs learn up to 1,000x faster than SOTA training — jmhernandez233 · 2026-09-22
- MiMo's GRS and GAR: scoring what makes an RL answer genuinely good, not just passing — tokenbender · 2026-09-22