Should AI labs publish math results or wait for gatekeepers? A 100-year view
DimitrisPapail · x · 2026-09-22
ChrSzegedy asks whether big AI labs should just release their math results or wait for gatekeepers' approval. DimitrisPapail replies that scientists 100 years from now, armed with far stronger AI, would likely find the right answer obvious — highlighting the tension between AI-accelerated math and traditional peer review.
Related event: Researchers debate how AI labs should release math results(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Physics Singularity Is Near: AI Could Compress 1000+ Years of Progress Into Years — Dr_Singularity · 2026-09-22
- Dartmouth Provost's op-eds flagged as 96% AI-written by near-zero-error detector Pangram — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-22
- Economists: falling labor share and rising real wages aren't in tension in the AI era — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-22
- Chatbots Were the Warm-Up: Why World Models May Underpin Physical AI — ingliguori · 2026-09-22
- Creator's rule for AI: delegate execution and retrieval, never surrender the thinking — romitheguru · 2026-09-22
- 39 peer-reviewed papers on catastrophic risk from AGI, systematically listed — ben_j_todd · 2026-09-22