Economists call for an epistemological shift in studying AI's economic impact
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-09-22
Economists are debating methodology for studying AI's economic effects. Alex Olegimas argues that while clean causal identification defines top-journal economics, such studies take years or decades — and we need signals now, even if imprecise. Soumitra Shukla agrees, adding that AI capabilities are step-changing between quarters (2026Q1 vs 2026Q3), making fixation on precise identification less useful. He echoes Daniel Rock on mismatched research norms and Anna Stansbury's call to give "collages of evidence" greater weight.
More from AGI Musings
- AI intimacy debate reaches the Vatican: meaningful bonds without deception — SucceededMind · 2026-09-22
- Clem Delangue: open RL environments are the new open pretraining data — Thom_Wolf · 2026-09-22
- Spirit AI employs ~1,000 people to manipulate objects, manufacturing robot training data by hand — VraserX · 2026-09-22
- OpenAI's AGI plan: build an automated AI researcher, then iterate on alignment with it — trevposts · 2026-09-22
- Investor Stewart Alsop mocks ego-bruised calls to slow down AI — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-22
- Stanford/Tsinghua paper claims 'dopamine neurons' in LLMs, researchers push back — aran_nayebi · 2026-09-22