Krueger: "indefinite" AI moratorium doesn't mean permanent
DavidSKrueger · x · 2026-09-22
AI safety researcher David Krueger pushes back on RokoMijic's claim that the extreme doomer position is a permanent moratorium on frontier AI, noting that many people wrongly assume "indefinite" means "permanent" — it does not. A semantic clarification in the ongoing AI-pause debate.
More from AGI Musings
- SemiAnalysis says open source is dying, yet 20+ open models shipped in the past month — _lewtun · 2026-09-22
- Tech has lost both Republicans and Democrats on AI and data centers — typewriters · 2026-09-22
- Strategy 101: incumbents tie complements, entrants break them — enter Muse — Afinetheorem · 2026-09-22
- Why Shopify says yes to Muse and Amazon says no: complements economics — Afinetheorem · 2026-09-22
- Kevin Roose laments millions buried heads in sand over AI skepticism, slow to update on evidence — jathansadowski · 2026-09-22
- NYT editorial invokes nuclear analogy: society can restrain dangerous innovations like AI — zetalyrae · 2026-09-22