Jeff Dean's Framework for Picking 5-Year Research Problems: Skim 100 Abstracts First
dawnsongtweets · x · 2026-09-21
Part 4 of the Jeff Dean conversation series: his framework for choosing a research problem worth five years.
- Start broad: "It's better to skim 10 papers than to read one in detail" — even 100 abstracts, building a cloud of what might be possible to connect unconnected important ideas
- Look for the right shape: if a 7-piece problem has 5 pieces becoming possible and 2 needing genuinely new but solvable ideas, that's the ideal 5-year problem
- Too obvious → incremental; too unknown → maybe 20 years too early
- Sweet spot: much of the path emerging, important pieces still to be invented
More from AGI Musings
- ICML 2027 chair crowdsources fixes for submission explosion; proposal for AI-only review track — thegautamkamath · 2026-09-22
- AI Doesn't Have to Fail for the Bubble to Burst — Distillation and Cheap Models Could Do It — budputnal · 2026-09-22
- AI safety circle revives the oracle-vs-agent debate: a useful oracle may be impossible — davidmanheim · 2026-09-22
- Still true in September 2026: mistaking benchmarks for real progress is an AI industry flaw — luislamb · 2026-09-22
- Not All AI Workers Buy the 'AI Could Kill Everyone' Narrative, BBC Reports — austinc3301 · 2026-09-22
- What Does 'Slowing Down AI' Actually Mean? Anthropic Preaches Pause, Ships Models — Impossible_Truth_629 · 2026-09-22