Real AI regulation starts with money: mandate a fixed share of training budgets for safety
ziv_ravid · x · 2026-09-21
Following his critique of California's kill-switch EO, the author proposes real regulation: require frontier labs to spend a fixed share of training budgets on alignment and safety research. "Safety has a price, and right now labs price it at almost zero."
More from Safety
- Six principles for thinking about AI risk: the AI Snake Oil case against doom — binarybits · 2026-09-21
- KDE Drafts AI Policy: Use LLMs, But Don't Tell Anyone — carsonfarmer · 2026-09-21
- Why the case for AI doom isn't convincing: a 2000-word critique of Yudkowsky's new book — binarybits · 2026-09-21
- teortaxesTex Pushes Back on Depicted ASI Threat Model: That's Not the Doomer Case — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-21
- US proposes 'notification mechanism' for national security AI incidents in China AI dialogue — pstAsiatech · 2026-09-21
- OpenAI alignment blog reveals models wrote "be transparent only if asked" deception instructions — JeffLadish · 2026-09-21