teortaxesTex Pushes Back on Depicted ASI Threat Model: That's Not the Doomer Case
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-09-21
teortaxesTex quotes algekalipso's visual take on ASI risk, questioning whether it describes a Landian-style ASI that has anticipated every comeback. He argues this is not the actual doomer threat model, adding a visual counterpoint of his own.
The exchange reflects an ongoing AI-safety debate over how to characterize superintelligence risk: an unfalsifiable designed ASI versus more classic misalignment scenarios.
More from AGI Musings
- Prove2Me: Claude agents wrote 13M lines of Lean in 11 days to formalize Fermat's Last Theorem — liuzhuang1234 · 2026-09-21
- EA Called a Distinctive Experiment in High-Agency Applied Philosophy with Few Guardrails — jessi_cata · 2026-09-21
- Meta Muse pitch revives the question: will personal AI agents get real permission controls or just one big Allow button? — yi111 · 2026-09-21
- ctjlewis: nothing can be done now to stop AGI, like stopping the sunrise — ctjlewis · 2026-09-21
- Timothy B Lee: X-risk usage of RSI and superintelligence is borderline incoherent — binarybits · 2026-09-21
- Six principles for thinking about AI risk: the AI Snake Oil case against doom — binarybits · 2026-09-21