Economists call for an epistemology shift: AI's economy needs evidence now, not perfect identification in a decade
danielrock · x · 2026-09-21
Economists are debating how to study AI's economic impact. Alex Olegimas argues that while clean-identification causal papers remain vital, they take a decade or more—and AI is moving too fast to wait.
- Anna Salomons (endorsed by Daniel Rock) calls for an "epistemology shift": assembling collages of descriptive empirical evidence, interpreted through theory, to understand what's happening and what comes next.
- The debate matters for anyone tracking AI's labor and productivity effects: rigorous causal work will come eventually, but imperfect signals are needed right now.
Related event: Economists Debate Whether AI Labor Research Can Wait for Causality(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Chamath Predicts Top 3 Models Go Open Source Within 12 Months, Clouds Win — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-21
- Giles Carden and Josh Freeman discuss AI and the future of universities — ArtificialOther · 2026-09-21
- Back-of-envelope math: 60k ICLR submissions equal roughly one per AI PhD student worldwide — kchonyc · 2026-09-21
- Nature Health Paper Proposes an 'Epidemiology of AI,' Arguing AI Is Now a Determinant of Health — EricTopol · 2026-09-21
- MIT Professor Patrick Winston's Free 'How to Speak' Lecture Hits 10M Views, Rattling $15K-a-Session Executive Coaches — WileyEd · 2026-09-21
- Should LLMs be first-pass reviewers for every scientific paper? Researchers say yes — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-21