ICLR review anonymity debate: most conferences still let senior reviewers and PCs see real names
AnkaReuel · x · 2026-09-21
A discussion around ICLR's review reforms: Anka Reuel corrects her earlier claim — not all conferences let senior reviewers see real names, though most enable program committee members to. She notes this doesn't change the ICLR case, since all identities become public after decisions. She raises a deeper concern: making names public may push enforcement of misconduct outside conferences and into the public domain, with uncertain effects.
More from Research
- Professor: 2-3 iterations with frontier models yields high-quality peer reviews — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-21
- Stanford professor plans AI-assisted peer reviews of 5-6 papers monthly — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-21
- Researchers ask: why is there no AI-first scientific journal with AI-run peer review? — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-21
- Waypoint Bio argues AI in biology has a data problem before a model problem — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-21
- New paper estimates LLMs raised US natural unemployment rate by 0.1-0.2 points — mattbeane · 2026-09-21
- JevBench open-sources a benchmark for typed decision models scoring intelligence, calibration and speed — sull · 2026-09-21