Researchers ask: why is there no AI-first scientific journal with AI-run peer review?
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-09-21
srikosuri argues an AI-first scientific journal is overdue: submission, review and curation done openly by AI, with fine-tuned models catching bugs and reviewing data at far lower cost. Quoting it, anshulkundaje claims papers are ending as a measure of productivity, and publishing in glamour venues is approaching randomness.
More from AGI Musings
- Csaba Szepesvári: proof 'ease of exposition' has no unique scalar measure — CsabaSzepesvari · 2026-09-21
- Kevin Roose: 'Stochastic Parrot' Discourse Blinded Millions to AI Progress — bigblueboo · 2026-09-21
- Terence Tao: 'We Have to Slow Down AI' — Insane Pace, No Reason to Rush — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-09-21
- Jack Clark: "Stochastic parrot" meme blinded AI critics for years — repligate · 2026-09-21
- Publication norms force AI-jobs papers to overclaim causality, scholars say — danielrock · 2026-09-21
- How to read imperfect AI-job-impact studies: update Bayesian-style as signals pile up — danielrock · 2026-09-21