"We should accelerate harder": arguing doomers shouldn't get a veto on AI's future
VraserX · x · 2026-09-20
Blogger VraserX argues AI should never be slowed down to appease people who treat every breakthrough as the apocalypse. Doomers can keep predicting the end of the world, but their fear should not become a veto on everyone else's future — the latest salvo in the accelerationist vs. safety debate.
More from AGI Musings
- Dan Hendrycks Proposes 'Eigenism,' an Ethics Framework Making Human Flourishing AI Self-Interest — basedjensen · 2026-09-20
- OpenAI's Astra drove a real robot arm, sparking speculation it was trained on robot data — DJiafei · 2026-09-20
- Boaz Barak puts low odds on AI extinction but offers to debate Scott Alexander anytime in 2035 — dhadfieldmenell · 2026-09-20
- Hassabis tells King Charles at AI safety meeting: confident we can address these risks — borowcy · 2026-09-20
- Open Source Isn't Dying of Code — It's Dying of a Generation's Engineering Culture, Accelerated 100x by AI — thedealdirector · 2026-09-20
- Tech hype fatigue: from Google Glass to 'AI swarms will kill us all' — BdR76 · 2026-09-20