Jev + Mercury 2.5 sweeps WebMCP benchmark 49/49 at ~112x lower cost than GPT-6 Astra
FinanceYF5 · x · 2026-09-20
A breakdown of an agent architecture built on interaction method rather than raw model power:
- Jev can only pick tools from discrete options; it can't generate arbitrary text like search queries.
- Mercury 2.5 fills that gap by generating tool parameters at 1000+ tokens/sec, fast and cheap.
- WebMCP turns website functionality into clean, directly callable tools.
Results: Jev alone via browser DOM completed only 25/49 tasks; with WebMCP it hit 49/49 — nearly double — while model cost dropped another 18%. Per the thread, the combo costs 112x less than GPT-6 Astra with code execution and 245x less than Astra driving a browser via screenshots. The takeaway: how an agent interacts with websites matters more than the model itself.
More from coding & agent
- Veteran game dev: "AI builds a full game in a day" posts are mostly hype — bendee983 · 2026-11-04
- Dev builds interactive Excel-to-dashboard with ChatGPT, shares the prompt — TermRemarkable665 · 2026-11-04
- Agents cut dev time from weeks to a day; bottleneck moved to specs and review — Suspicious_Orchid770 · 2026-11-04
- Orgo, a YC-backed platform giving AI agents their own cloud desktops, claims 1,000+ teams — Scobleizer · 2026-11-04
- Founder: Vibe-coded a PMF-successful product, then hired pro devs to fix the mess — sujingshen · 2026-11-04
- One prompt to audit cross-region traffic: dev cut trans-Atlantic latency by moving a service — DanielLockyer · 2026-11-04