I tested Jev on 12 real workflows: 1,000 emails judged for nine cents
minchoi · x · 2026-09-20
@nateherk tested Jev across 12 real use cases. Key takeaway: Jev only returns decisions (yes/no, a category, or a score) — it doesn't write the follow-up response.
Findings:
- 1,000 emails through seven decision rules cost about nine cents; six seconds after parallelizing
- Covered YouTube comments, community posts, meetings, and video clips
- Built a Chrome extension that judges X posts while scrolling
- Ran a Bitcoin paper-trading experiment requesting a decision every second
The lesson: separating the "judging" step from generation in existing automations cuts both cost and latency.
More from coding & agent
- Eric Schmidt: UIs will largely disappear as agents make 90% of web traffic non-human — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-20
- Building an Interactive Peach Blossom Spring Web Experience with GPT 6 Astra — dotey · 2026-09-20
- Open-source demo routes email fraud detection via Jev + Kimi K3: 96/100 accurate for $0.07 — nutlope · 2026-09-20
- Gemini CLI fix: explicit gemini-3-pro-preview IDs no longer silently rewritten to 3.1 — FanouZeng-TT · 2026-09-20
- No model is good enough to supervise itself, and multi-model harnesses don't fix it — alexcovo_eth · 2026-09-20
- 10 AWS Agentic AI Projects That Take You From Beginner to Production — _jaydeepkarale · 2026-09-20