Plinz argues academic philosophy failed to predict AI and misled the public
akbirthko · x · 2026-09-20
Plinz argues that academic philosophy not only failed to predict AI but actively misled public expectations, warranting reflection on the state of top academic thinking. akbirthko adds that the takes that got it right came from those dunking on traditional academic philosophy.
More from AGI Musings
- binarybits: Rogue Self-Sovereign AI Agents Too Unclear to Regulate Now — binarybits · 2026-09-20
- Researcher Describes Academic 'Resource Curse' Where Data Cabals Shield Bad Papers From Criticism — RexDouglass · 2026-09-20
- "Major companies have likely already been penetrated by nation states," argues founder amid agent rollout wave — adityaag · 2026-09-20
- Researcher: When AI outperforms humans at peer review, journals become obsolete — panickssery · 2026-09-20
- Two high school students, aided by AI, report progress on a problem studied by Fields medalist June Huh — IgorCarron · 2026-09-20
- Polymarket GPT-7 release odds: 27% by mid-2027, 84% by end of 2027 — Polymarket · 2026-09-20