Researcher: When AI outperforms humans at peer review, journals become obsolete
panickssery · x · 2026-09-20
Panickssery argues on X that once AI is better than humans at peer review, the journal process itself becomes unnecessary — people can spontaneously form their own "journals" by trawling arXiv for papers they consider high quality, bypassing traditional publishing gatekeepers.
More from AGI Musings
- Mustafa Suleyman: AIs are hollow sequence engines; researchers call it ideology, not science — burny_tech · 2026-09-20
- AI is rapidly toppling famous math problems, with OpenAI cracking a Navier-Stokes-related result — burny_tech · 2026-09-20
- HF researcher: 'Loss-of-control evals are sexy' while bias and social impact work gets ignored — evijit · 2026-09-20
- Peter Diamandis: 100,000 genius-level employees reporting to you is this decade's real offer — PeterDiamandis · 2026-09-20
- Demis, Jensen and AI leaders gathered by King Charles urge 'responsible optimism' on AI — Reza_Zadeh · 2026-09-20
- Are AI 'rogue agent' safety stories real capability demos or self-serving narratives? — North-Ad6031 · 2026-09-20