SE veteran calls for de-anonymized peer review to catch AI-generated paper spam
moarbugs · x · 2026-09-19
Software engineering researcher @devanbu complains that reviewers are receiving submissions full of AI-written, incomprehensible prose, and suggests it may be time to revert to de-anonymized review to identify who is flooding conferences — even threatening to decline reviewing for venues that don't reveal author identities.
More from Research
- Specter Core: an open-source multi-agent governance experiment with no final authority, not even the ASI — AIGODSEND · 2026-09-19
- AgentVLN: a 3B VLM brain tops R2R-CE and RxR-CE in real time on Jetson — jiqizhixin · 2026-09-19
- willccbb: self-play + self-calibration is how you do recursive self-improvement — willcb · 2026-09-19
- Split Monolithic Agents Into a Generation Layer Plus Small Classifiers — aigclink · 2026-09-19
- A Lean-verified proof can still prove the wrong theorem: scrutinizing OpenAI's Navier-Stokes claim — MasterWitcher69 · 2026-09-19
- OpenDataArena's Spark-234K, a 234K-sample machine-generated English text dataset, trends on Hugging Face — OpenDataArena · 2026-09-19