1,300 AI employees signed a 'pacing' letter, but their motives diverge sharply
chalmermagne · x · 2026-09-18
Alex Chalmers, writing for the Cosmos Institute, critiques the 'Pacing the Frontier' coalition.
- In July, over 1,300 employees from leading AI companies signed an open letter arguing frontier labs may be nearing the point where AI research itself can be automated, asking the US government to back international efforts to develop governance tools for deliberately slowing frontier AI.
- Signatories' motives differ widely: Dario Amodei has since argued for external evaluators embedded at labs, coordination among democracies, and international agreements — endorsed by Elon Musk and Sam Altman. Dawn Song champions decentralization, John Schulman mentions a 'possible need' for such a mechanism, and Ilya Sutskever says future AI will require 'unprecedented measures.'
- Chalmers's core point: these concerns aren't mutually exclusive but imply very different pacing mechanisms, and given the potential expansion of state power, the debate over this vaguely defined intervention needs to improve.
More from AGI Musings
- Yesterday's rebels become today's orthodoxy: a pattern that keeps repeating in AI — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-19
- Full CNBC Video: Suleyman Questions Anthropic's Constitution on AI Welfare — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-19
- NumPy Creator Travis Oliphant: Renting Intelligence Builds Landlords, Owning Models Builds Ecosystems — teoliphant · 2026-09-19
- Ben Goertzel: Centibillionaires Now Accelerate Tech Deployment and Capture the Commons — bengoertzel · 2026-09-19
- 10% catastrophic risk claims plus misalignment reports leave users struggling to keep up — _arohan_ · 2026-09-19
- Even ASI believers are warming to the idea of a hard intelligence ceiling — MoonL88537 · 2026-09-19