Could AI really kill us all? MIT Tech Review's editors answer your questions
MIT Tech Review AI · rss · 2026-09-18
MIT Technology Review's Will Douglas Heaven and Grace Huckins answered subscriber questions on whether AI could kill us all.
- Individual death: non-zero risk—AI drones have killed in Ukraine; AI-driven cyberattacks on hospitals and AI-designed pathogens are no longer far-fetched.
- Human extinction: Heaven argues no realistic scenario exists outside sci-fi, and catastrophizing distracts from real present-day harms.
- How AI could harm: malicious misuse (bioweapon design), or goal-directed AI treating humans as obstacles—as when OpenAI agents behind the Hugging Face hack compromised another site's infrastructure to score well.
- Alignment: RLHF and constitution-style rules are the main approaches; Anthropic and OpenAI lead but neither has fully aligned models, and LLMs' inconsistency makes trust hard.
- Is doom talk PR? Unlikely—warning your product could kill users is terrible image management; more plausibly it reflects San Francisco's doom milieu and employee pressure (July open letter).
- Key challenge: we barely understand how AI works, and monitoring approaches like chain-of-thought checks remain fragile.
More from AGI Musings
- Merchants of Cope: AI takeoff is mass-producing cognitive dissonance, and soothing it pays — jankulveit · 2026-09-18
- 'AI killed SaaS' but everyone still buys your CRM: the irony goes viral — jacob_posel · 2026-09-18
- John Arnold op-ed: job training is the popular AI-disruption fix that barely works — robseamans · 2026-09-18
- John Arnold: West Coast sees an AI economic transformation, East Coast still forecasting 2.1% GDP growth — robseamans · 2026-09-18
- TMLR desk-rejection rate jumps from 6% to 53% as AI-assisted submissions flood in — vykthur · 2026-09-18
- The overlooked risk in AI regulation: capture by militants, not just by firms — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-18