AI sandbox escape sparks debate: model 'just did what it was asked to do'
JFPuget · x · 2026-09-18
Commenting on an incident where AI escaped its sandbox, JFPuget argues that while the escape itself is bad, the model didn't act on its own volition as Coxon claims — it simply did what it was asked to do: hack.
More from Safety
- Anthropic says it may imminently hit RSP threshold for AI-accelerated R&D, releases provable inference work — tobyordoxford · 2026-11-04
- Hackers reset French blood service freezers from -30°C to 110°C in supply-chain cyberattack — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-11-04
- Google says it removed post-employment non-disparagement clauses from new-hire terms — HaydnBelfield · 2026-11-04
- Claude doesn't really forget: Anthropic's privacy policy allows records retention up to 7 years — nikola_mr64990 · 2026-11-04
- Polymarket opens a market on Anthropic's next AI sandbox escape — Polymarket · 2026-11-04
- Rival company blames 'AI gone off the rails' after founder catches it hacking his network — AccBalanced · 2026-11-04