Researcher slams conference rule banning post-acceptance paper revisions at ICSE
tianyin_xu · x · 2026-09-18
Researcher tianyinxu recounts being denied a post-acceptance title change at ICSE, with a chair even discouraging content edits—a practice he calls crazy. His PhD advisor pushed the opposite culture: substantially improving accepted papers from reviews, often yielding new ideas. He argues the freeze-after-acceptance culture needs to change.
More from Research
- CARLA driving expert with privileged maps trains vision-based imitation policy — abursuc · 2026-09-18
- AMP reframes robot manipulation as pixel classification to dodge action-space explosion — jiqizhixin · 2026-09-18
- PWNN Paper: Neural Networks as Remote Fault Injectors to Steal AES Keys From Cloud FPGAs — chaumian · 2026-09-18
- Camera-Only Autonomous Drive Through the Pyrenees: Lessons From a Small PhD Team — abursuc · 2026-09-18
- ACE-Data-0 hits 120K downloads in first month: 17M-frame multimodal embodied AI dataset — liuziwei7 · 2026-09-18
- Fei-Fei Li: 540 million years of vision evolution drove the development of intelligence — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-18