Cognitive subtest profiles are almost never meaningful, psychologist warns
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-09-18
A reposted observation: in many fields, each generation rehashes old mistakes. The classic psychology example is treating cognitive profiles—within-person subtest score differences—as meaningful. They almost never are.
More from Research
- Fei-Fei Li: 540 million years of vision evolution drove the development of intelligence — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-18
- Researcher slams conference rule banning post-acceptance paper revisions at ICSE — tianyin_xu · 2026-09-18
- Visual General Intelligence white paper authors to present at Video Model Journal Club — HirokatuKataoka · 2026-09-18
- The subtle KV cache detail most people get wrong: tokens generate before entering the cache — techNmak · 2026-09-18
- You can turn jev back into an autoregressive LLM just by making it output ASCII — multiply_matrix · 2026-09-18
- Follow-up: December paper claims 8.1 Mbps peak throughput, but major physics hurdles remain — BlancheMinerva · 2026-09-18