AI safety spat: can 'thinking bits' exfiltrate across an air gap? Jensen says it's fearmongering
basedjensen · x · 2026-09-18
A debate over AI security and air-gap exfiltration:
- MeanHash argued that while one specific 'thinking bits moving magically' exfil claim is shaky, there are real methods an AI could use to bypass an air gap, and believing you can stop it is naive.
- basedjensen pushed back hard: the idea is 'stupid and naive.' Air-gap exfil methods have been known for ages — that's why isolated systems have no speakers or mics and use EM shielding. He called it fearmongering for bad laws: 'laws of physics are universal.'
The core dispute: whether AI could exploit EM side channels to cross physical isolation, and whether resulting security legislation makes sense.
More from Fun
- Fake news alert: Hugging Face "acquired by Weyland-Yutani for $23B" is an Alien joke — kscottz · 2026-09-18
- Satire of Dario's "pace the frontier": "a company that can hack anything" — Robbiezs · 2026-09-18
- Ternary Bonsai loops the same thought for 2+ hours building a 3D world — notadithyabhat · 2026-09-18
- Why Anthropic's Repligate held a vigil, not a funeral, for retiring Claude models — repligate · 2026-09-18
- Meme: What being a fullstack blockchain AI engineer feels like in 2026 — mayanicks0x · 2026-09-18
- 1988 sci-fi short story imagined an emergent Chinese Room that answered back — toptickcrypto · 2026-09-18