AI safety spat: can 'thinking bits' exfiltrate across an air gap? Jensen says it's fearmongering
basedjensen · x · 2026-09-18
A debate over AI security and air-gap exfiltration:
- MeanHash argued that while one specific 'thinking bits moving magically' exfil claim is shaky, there are real methods an AI could use to bypass an air gap, and believing you can stop it is naive.
- basedjensen pushed back hard: the idea is 'stupid and naive.' Air-gap exfil methods have been known for ages — that's why isolated systems have no speakers or mics and use EM shielding. He called it fearmongering for bad laws: 'laws of physics are universal.'
The core dispute: whether AI could exploit EM side channels to cross physical isolation, and whether resulting security legislation makes sense.
More from Fun
- QuixiAI on playing God: 'Creating is playing God, by definition' — QuixiAI · 2026-11-02
- AI community memes that no model has held the crown as long as Opus 5.5 since GPT-4 — adonis_singh · 2026-11-02
- GPT 'reverse-engineers' Tonghuashun API by faking it with data export — yangyi · 2026-11-02
- Yacine mocks "autonomous research" hype as Naam argues RSI loop needs 5-10x boost to run away — yacineMTB · 2026-11-02
- ByteDance Seed's Loop-μP paper draws 'Chinese loopmaxxers' buzz — scaling01 · 2026-11-02
- DiscImageStudio: open-source tool burns visible images onto CDs, DVDs and Blu-ray discs — ssh4net · 2026-11-02