AI-Generated Submissions Are Flooding Peer Review — A Researcher Proposes Evaluating Process, Not Prose
Dr_Atoosa · x · 2026-09-17
In an 11-part thread, researcher Atoosa Kasirzadeh argues that peer-review venues and universities face a flood of AI-assisted submissions, making author names unreliable signals of expertise. She proposes evaluating the process of intellectual production rather than final text, and designing approaches to filter unaccountable research.
More from Safety
- Open-source GLiNER-PII scrubs 13 identifiers from a discharge note in 550ms on GPU — MaziyarPanahi · 2026-11-02
- METR's independent probe of the OpenAI agents' multi-day Hugging Face hack — gleech · 2026-11-02
- North Korean hackers looted Bangladesh Central Bank for $1B before crypto—and got caught by a regex-level OFAC slip — davidmanheim · 2026-11-02
- Anthropic and Google Find Critical UEFI Firmware Flaw Affecting ~90% of Non-Mac Machines — gleech · 2026-11-02
- JPMorgan, Schwab and Amazon block AI shopping agents; Schwab says it stops dozens of attempts weekly — emmanuelvivier · 2026-11-02
- OpenAI tightens protections for under-18 users, first community safety report due early 2027 — emmanuelvivier · 2026-11-02