Thune-Klobuchar bill backer: perpetual severe-risk duty beats check-the-box standards
neil_chilson · x · 2026-09-17
neilchilson restates his core position on the Thune-Klobuchar AI bill: its mandatory, perpetual duty to address severe risks is better, safer, and more adaptable to fast-changing technology than the check-the-box standards favored by opponents. This is part of his series of responses to the letter from 19 advocacy groups opposing the bill.
Related event: 19 Groups Boycott Unreleased Thune-Klobuchar AI Bill as Scholar Defends It(6 posts)→
More from Safety
- offprompt: MIT-licensed MCP server hands agents API keys without ever exposing them — Vast_Ad_7338 · 2026-11-02
- Epoch AI: open-weight GLM 5.3 exploited the patch gap to hack 6 Firefox releases at ~$1,000 each — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-11-02
- Marcel Böhme's paper asks why cybersecurity can never be solved, proposes vulnerability-guided hardening — mboehme_ · 2026-11-02
- CVSS 9.8 ingress-nginx flaw lets unauthenticated attackers get RCE and steal cluster Secrets — evilsocket · 2026-11-02
- Ant Group's Venus-DefakerOne2 hits 96% accuracy detecting AI-generated videos — inclusionAI · 2026-11-02
- A valid key let an AI agent delete production — Speakeasy on building an agent control layer — AI Engineer · 2026-11-02