The 2017 2:1 AI-risk bet looks far better for Eliezer after GPT-1
archerships · x · 2026-09-16
davidmanheim concedes the 2017 2:1 bet on AI risk looks far better for Eliezer now than when it was made, since it predates GPT-1—weakening the argument that capability progress doesn't support the concerns.
Related event: AI doom debate reignites over risk bets(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- TIME's Doomer Reporters Allegedly Paid by Dustin Moskovitz's Foundation via Tarbell Fellowship — basedjensen · 2026-09-16
- Mozilla Report: China-US AI Model Capability Gap Narrows to 4.4 Months — External_Mood4719 · 2026-09-16
- AI Can Build Your Product but It Can't Automate Demand — alexmacgregor__ · 2026-09-16
- AI Safety Critics: Guardrails Gatekeep Values, Not Paperclips — Why EA Ignores Ideological Hegemony — inductionheads · 2026-09-16
- NYT Opinion: It's Already Too Late to Stop the AI Threat — pstAsiatech · 2026-09-16
- Bill Gates warns the coming AI era will be among history's most turbulent — jerupjerup · 2026-09-16