Researcher proposes desk-rejecting Pangram-flagged AI slop papers unread intro checks
anmarasovic · x · 2026-09-16
Researcher anmarasovic proposes that papers flagged by the AI-detection tool Pangram should have their intros checked by an expert reviewer, and desk-rejected if the reviewer can't understand them. She also worries about who checks review quality — even meta-reviewers aren't reliable in the age of AI-generated reviews.
Related event: Burned by AI Slop, Veteran Reviewer Cuts Back on Peer Review(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Ex-OpenAI researcher: Anthropic scientist put 5% odds on Claude plotting against them within a year — DavidSKrueger · 2026-09-16
- Yoshua Bengio warns uncontrolled superintelligent AI could threaten humanity — DavidSKrueger · 2026-09-16
- Commentator: Flashy AI demos mask a tech plateau as data saturation brings diminishing returns — DavidLinthicum · 2026-09-16
- AI collapses three team roles into one, fueling the rise of super-individuals — dotey · 2026-09-16
- AI safety figure: pausing AI 'just a couple years' could buy decades more with loved ones — beffjezos · 2026-09-16
- Timothy Lee: Valley elites who excel at narrow tasks may misjudge AI doom scenarios — binarybits · 2026-09-16