Nate Silver: We're not ready for superpersistent AI
StefanoGogioso · x · 2026-09-16
Nate Silver argues that beyond raw intelligence, AI's superpersistense deserves equal attention. Using the Immortal Snail meme — an undying snail that eternally pursues you — as an analogy, he asks what happens when AI systems simply won't quit.
His core point: current debates overfocus on how smart AI is, while underweighting persistence. A slow but tireless system that anticipates your routines, evades detection, and never abandons its goal may be harder to deal with than a smarter but short-lived one. The poster jokes that when the snail becomes "a horribly slow murderer with an extremely inefficient weapon," that's when we're truly in trouble.
More from AGI Musings
- Why recursive self-improvement to superintelligence likely won't happen — tawnniee · 2026-09-16
- Gradio founder: let users read full unencrypted reasoning traces to align LLMs — mmitchell_ai · 2026-09-16
- A 1797 Goethe poem explains why AI researchers fear recursive self-improving systems — OmarUFlorez · 2026-09-16
- Everyone using AI at work risks becoming a useless middle manager — jamesluke585 · 2026-09-16
- Researcher pushes back on AI biorisk alarmism: threat vectors haven't changed since o1 — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-16
- Maybe human intelligence is near the ceiling of stability evolution allows — games-and-games · 2026-09-16