Defending astra for robotics: availability matters more than speed, researcher argues
Zergylord · x · 2026-09-14
Responding to researchers dismissing "astra for robotics" hype as a fad — not built for low-level control, slower than WAMs/VLAs — the author argues they miss the point: everyone knows demo videos are sped up 50x, and it's too expensive for repeated real use, but it can already do many valuable slow tasks, prices will drop and speed improve within 6-12 months, and crucially anyone can start using it in minutes. Physical AI labs should copy this "ship it early" approach.
More from AGI Musings
- Kevin Roose's Machine Gods pod: why scientists are mad at OpenAI solving their hardest problems — kevinroose · 2026-10-30
- Cryptographer Matthew Green: Anthropic's agent worm framing is unhelpful, we need a simulated one to know — matthew_d_green · 2026-10-30
- Ethan Mollick on AI and work: 'You're a hand-weaver in a world of power looms' — emollick · 2026-10-30
- Vercel founder Rauch: trust is the deepest moat for a post-AGI business — soleio · 2026-10-30
- Scattered Across AI Assistants: A New Kind of Cognitive Failure Nobody Has a Prior For — manosaie · 2026-10-30
- a16z partners: 10-20M people drive $150-200B in token spend, and AI workspaces will eat the browser — petergyang · 2026-10-30