Researchers Say Publishing Hallucinated Citations Is Fraud Worthy of Retraction
MaxUnfried · x · 2026-09-14
Cremieux reminds academics that publishing hallucinated citations constitutes fraud: such papers should be retracted and authors punished. Max Unfried amplifies the call, arguing academia needs to become much harsher in treating AI-hallucinated references as genuine misconduct.
More from AGI Musings
- Core AI/ML alone rarely gets you hired: the four app-layer skills AI engineers need — ashishllm · 2026-09-14
- Everything verifiable will be automated: how scientists stay relevant alongside AI scientists — thoefler · 2026-09-14
- AGI by definition will do things labs don't understand—safety issues are real — thederbiedone · 2026-09-14
- Dario Amodei reportedly confirms RSI has begun, warns of AI swarms taking over the internet — mikeflache · 2026-09-14
- Beff Jezos calls for accelerating neurotech to co-evolve humans with AI — beffjezos · 2026-09-14
- Do you believe OpenAI, Anthropic and X will actually slow down AI? — CartographerJust3308 · 2026-09-14