Critic calls Anthropic's policy stance 'regulatory capture 101' harming consumers today
arampell · x · 2026-09-14
arampell attacks the 'big is per se bad' antitrust stance — Amazon private labels that lower prices are treated as harmful only because harm might occur someday. He argues the case against Anthropic is textbook regulatory capture causing current consumer harm: stopping open source and colluding with competitors to slow progress so inference can stay profitable, which only works with banned open source and regulatory capture.
More from Companies & People
- Salesforce gave up the screen: agents become first-class principals in the enterprise — sanjaykalra · 2026-09-14
- Report: Anthropic Builds Predictive 'Pre-Crime' Surveillance to Monitor Activists — marigo · 2026-09-14
- This Week's AI Reading: Dario's Slowdown Plea, Meta's Muse Agent, Oracle Cloud Up 121% — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-09-14
- Beff Jezos jokes everyone should sue Dario for the weekend's cortisol spike — beffjezos · 2026-09-14
- Enterprise small-model projects risk major resource misallocation, execs warn — matt_slotnick · 2026-09-14
- Yacine to interview Vicki Boykis on how a beginner would learn AI in 2026 — yacinelearning · 2026-09-14