Poster argues humanity will use massive AGI swarms and stall ASI instead of building it
JOBhakdi · x · 2026-09-13
An X user clarifies his view: while he holds ASI = 100% doom, his general p(doom) is very low because humanity will recognize the risk and avoid letting ASI emerge for a long time—better to use huge swarms of AGI agents to solve problems. The quoted post argues ASI risk ≠ p(doom), suggesting Neuralink reflects a gradual human-AI merger strategy, becoming a tertiary brain layer rather than an implanted ChatGPT.
More from AGI Musings
- Open source AI will split into open vs "safe" open, says Hugging Face and OpenRouter will get nerfed — DevDminGod · 2026-09-13
- AI slowdown debate: first-mover advantages make enforceable pausing a classic defection problem — taherdhanera · 2026-09-13
- The old link between believing in AI existential risk and good epistemics is about to break — anpaure · 2026-09-13
- Developer grills OpenAI: has AGI been declared, and where is the expert panel? — tomchapin · 2026-09-13
- Open AI governance debate: only power concentration benefits a concentrated few — yacineMTB · 2026-09-13
- Researcher predicts open-source AI models will be banned after a major disaster — TinfoilTricorn · 2026-09-13