OpenAI's Millennium Prize proof sparks credit feud as 25 Fields Medalists push back
CiccioPixel · reddit · 2026-09-13
A dispute erupted over the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize problem: NYU's Tristan Buckmaster and Anthropic's Levent Alpöge announced progress, then OpenAI released its own full proof — reportedly from an unreleased model that burned 300B output tokens, roughly $22.5M in compute, in about a week. Buckmaster alleges his progress leaked to OpenAI beforehand and that OpenAI's Sébastien Bubeck pressured him to drop his collaborator's credit, allegedly saying "why would you ruin your career." OpenAI denies seeing their work but can't fully rule out anonymized product data playing a role. 25 Fields Medalists signed an open letter against racing proofs without proper writeup and attribution, and OpenAI pulled sponsorship of a Caltech math event after researcher backlash. The story is less about whether AI can do math than what happens to scientific credit once compute-rich labs race individual academics.
More from Companies & People
- Bindu Reddy mocks Google: it trails even open source, nowhere near the frontier — bindureddy · 2026-09-13
- AI Book Club reads Nathan Lambert's RLHF book, author Q&A on Sep 24 — natolambert · 2026-09-13
- Stanford tuition runs $260K, but 2,100+ free courses put its full AI curriculum online for anyone — Aiden_Tech_Ai · 2026-09-13
- Investor Jeff Weinstein wants to back agent-first hardware and new OSes — jeff_weinstein · 2026-09-13
- OpenAI hosts GPT-6 Astra hackathon; attendees say GPT-Live-1 blew their minds — gabrielchua · 2026-09-13
- NYT's front page full of AI regulation calls as firms rush to ditch frontier models — OvertaxedOne · 2026-09-13