Statistician pushes back: a complete AI math proof would be celebrated if done by a human
skdh · x · 2026-09-13
Statistician skdh responds to @kareemcarr's analogy, arguing it doesn't hold: the AI produced a complete proof, and the same result from a human would have been widely celebrated. The exchange highlights a double standard in how AI-generated mathematical results are judged.
More from AGI Musings
- David Deutsch: Stop measuring knowledge or creativity, remove constraints instead — NinaDSchick · 2026-09-13
- OpenAI researcher: decouple frontier model pacing rules from open-source restrictions — jachiam0 · 2026-09-13
- Critics Claim Anthropic and OpenAI Are Building a 'Legal Cartel' via Safety Push — AlexTensor · 2026-09-13
- Radiologist AI Debate Shows People Think in Memes, Not About Labor Reallocation — AndyMasley · 2026-09-13
- The End of Sisyphus: AI won't free us, it forces us to choose which mountains exist — YogeshMalik · 2026-09-13
- Yishan Defends Dario/Sama's AI Pacing Plan Against 'China Will Win' Objections — yi_ding · 2026-09-13