Does human-to-ASI upgrading leave baseline humans structurally behind?
MugaSofer · x · 2026-09-13
MugaSofer pushes back on a common stance: while one might personally want to become an ASI, upgrading a human doesn't change the fact that baseline humans remain structurally disadvantaged. The question sparks discussion with voooooogel about posthuman representation and the fate of baseline humanity.
A substantive debate on alignment and posthuman issues in AGI discourse.
Related event: Debate: Does Upgrading Humans to ASI Fix Baseline Humans' Disadvantage?(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Dario Amodei pens essay urging AI industry to slow down, Anthropic opens permanent third-party access — AaronBergman18 · 2026-09-13
- Guardian podcast examines "AI psychosis" among chatbot true believers — nordicinst · 2026-09-13
- tszzl: models aren't autonomously producing research ideas — RSI is not here yet — i_dg23 · 2026-09-13
- Why pure commercial incentives will force frontier AI labs to slow down — scottleibrand · 2026-09-13
- Reddit essay warns RSI race without interpretability is AI's biggest existential risk — Glittering-Neck-2505 · 2026-09-13
- repligate Reposts 'Target Fixation' Wikipedia Entry in AI Context — repligate · 2026-09-13