AI weapons/factory veteran: AI safety is for their benefit, not yours
tawnniee · x · 2026-09-13
A practitioner who spent her career applying AI to vehicles, weapons, and factories recalls being called delusional by MIT/CMU/Stanford PhD colleagues—now claims vindication. She warns that AI safety advocacy serves insiders' interests rather than protecting ordinary people, a provocative take in the AI safety debate.
More from AGI Musings
- Math frontier will move with AI, but dirty proofs are unacceptable — njyx · 2026-09-13
- Dario Amodei's new essay urges pacing AI frontier, pledges permanent third-party access — dhadfieldmenell · 2026-09-13
- UK parliament hears warnings AI could kill all humans within a decade, with >10% risk cited — connoraxiotes · 2026-09-13
- Skeptic picks apart the 'AI copies itself' doomsday scenario: where are the details? — recallingmemories · 2026-09-13
- David Deutsch, Nick Bostrom and more debate whether LLMs can reach AGI at Oxford — anderssandberg · 2026-09-13
- Regulation is coming for open and closed AI models alike — the question is proactive or reactive — benjamin_warner · 2026-09-13