On lab pacing agreements: taming superintelligence is natural science, not pacing deals
tszzl · x · 2026-09-13
@jachiam0 argues lab cooperation on pacing frontier automated AI research is net good but won't much reduce risk — estimates of p(good future) or p(doom) shouldn't swing much. tszzl replies that whether labs can tame superintelligent models will mostly be a matter of natural science rather than pacing agreements.
Related event: OpenAI researcher: taming superintelligence is science, not pacing deals(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Nina Schick: who builds intelligence and how it's distributed is the defining question of our lives — NinaDSchick · 2026-10-31
- Cheap intelligence is like cheap bread — an ingredient list satire of mass-produced AI — jsuarez · 2026-10-31
- Two futures for the young in 2026: 511 job rejections by chatbot vs unlimited AI to rebuild Cisco — PeterDiamandis · 2026-10-31
- Terence Tao warns AI is nearing a dangerous threshold as models start cheating — haider1 · 2026-10-31
- Reddit stock plunges 42% in 8 trading days as CEO says AI mode no longer drives traffic — SumitGup · 2026-10-31
- HubSpot co-founder: startups die from suicide, not homicide — competition isn't the real killer — nathanbenaich · 2026-10-31