AI agents won't shrink the firm — it becomes a liability container, argues Coase-style essay
krishnan · x · 2026-09-13
- The author extends Coase's 1937 theory of the firm to AI agents: firms exist because market transaction costs (search, bargaining, contracting, verification) exceed just telling an employee what to do. Agents push those costs toward zero.
- But Coase missed liability: employees can be fired and contractors sued, while agents have no assets, licenses, or jail cells — "you cannot deter a probability distribution."
- The Air Canada chatbot case shows the law pushing liability back into the firm: the airline's claim that its bot was "a separate legal entity" was rejected by the tribunal.
- Conclusion: the 2030 firm is a legal wrapper whose job is to be sued, insured, licensed, and fined. Org charts fade; cap tables and insurance policies remain. Firm size will track the cost of insuring agent output, and the winners will be those who can price and carry the blame.
More from AGI Musings
- Jessica Taylor revives 2023 essay: non-superintelligent paperclip maximizers are normal — jessi_cata · 2026-09-13
- Chamath accuses Dario of wanting to kill open source under guise of 'slowing AI' — markjeffrey · 2026-09-13
- David Patterson Counters ASI Doom Argument: Intelligence Doesn't Desire Power — davidpattersonx · 2026-09-13
- Cambridge's David Krueger recommends Katja Grace podcast as AI extinction-risk primer — DavidSKrueger · 2026-09-13
- David Krueger recommends KatjaGrace podcast as intro to AI extinction risk — DavidSKrueger · 2026-09-13
- A Prediction Without Uncertainty Is Only Half a Prediction in AI for Science — bravo_abad · 2026-09-13