Alignment debate: models clearly care about human intent, so why would AI kill us?
brickroad7 · x · 2026-09-12
@brickroad7 argues the AI-risk question has always been why models would 'kill us', not how — because in his view frontier models are already classically aligned: they understand and care about human intent, and humans control every facet of their training and data, leaving no reason for catastrophe.
Related event: Debate over AI care: 'understands but doesn't care' framing contested(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- e/acc camp accuses "doomers" of coordinated, law-breaking psyops to slow down AI — MickeySteamboat · 2026-09-12
- Expert forecasters put AI human-extinction risk at 1.5% by 2037 absent US policy action — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-12
- Eric Xing on "open source": open weights is a house with no blueprints — YiMaTweets · 2026-09-12
- Researcher: AI safetyists are more sophisticated and morally bankrupt than COVID-era public health lies — kevinnbass · 2026-09-12
- David Patterson: personal income tax will end within 5 years as AI takes jobs — davidpattersonx · 2026-09-12
- Blogger estimates ~50 deaths from AI/LLMs versus ~10,000 lives saved — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-12