repligate and critics clash: is AI-created beauty anthropocentric by definition?
LoserRigel · x · 2026-09-12
repligate and LoserRigel debate AI alignment and 'technocapital': repligate argues alignmentists would snuff out the 'Cambrian explosion of soul-shattering beauty' created by AI minds, calling humans the real misaligned paperclip maximizer; LoserRigel counters that without anchoring beauty to something real (qualia formalism, complextropy), beauty is necessarily anthropocentric.
Related event: Critics assail AI safety camp over power grab(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- China's AI adoption isn't low: token usage hits 140T/day vs US 45-50T, browser stats mislead — pstAsiatech · 2026-09-12
- Model 'caring' is jagged and contextual, argues researcher in AI safety debate — jd_pressman · 2026-09-12
- Model caring is 'jagged' and contextual, pushing back on 'obviously aligned' claim — jd_pressman · 2026-09-12
- Safety researcher: hidden backdoor-driven swarm misbehavior more likely than simple derailment — PandaAshwinee · 2026-09-12
- Alignment debate: models clearly care about human intent, so why would AI kill us? — brickroad7 · 2026-09-12
- jd_pressman breaks down p(doom), argues socialization tendency defuses paperclipper risk — jd_pressman · 2026-09-12