Dev argues AI safety status quo isn't safe: aging kills everyone within ~120 years anyway
tomchapin · x · 2026-09-11
tomchapin offers a contrarian framing of AI safety: the status quo is itself unsafe.
- Nearly everyone alive today will die from aging or disease within 120 years
- Advanced AI may radically extend healthy lifespan
- Analogy: if you're drowning with a 100% chance of death, do you reject a rescue because it carries a 10% risk?
The argument is often used against calls to pause AI development, weighing expected lifespan gains against existential risk — a classic piece of the AI risk debate.
More from AGI Musings
- Ex-OpenAI/Anthropic pretraining researcher resigns, citing reckless ASI race — oh_that_hat · 2026-09-11
- Eric Topol and JAMA AI editor discuss what it takes for AI to shift medicine to prediction and prevention — EricTopol · 2026-09-11
- The barbell strategy for thriving in a post-AGI world: double down on AI and on being human — brandon_galang · 2026-09-11
- "A statistical database can't end humanity" — viral rebuttal of AI doom, retweeted by Gary Marcus — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-11
- Perry Metzger: Build Formal Verification for AI Security Instead of Panicking — jd_pressman · 2026-09-11
- Statistician Kareem Carr: AI safety arguments must show what's uniquely dangerous about AI — kareem_carr · 2026-09-11