NYT report on Anthropic halting bio-research sparks backlash over 'malicious' framing
basedjensen · x · 2026-09-11
The New York Times reported that Anthropic halted potential plots by scientists who used its AI models for research that could have helped develop biological weapons, with Anthropic noting it couldn't determine whether the research was legitimate or nefarious since valid biological inquiry can also aid pathogen engineering.
The poster (via DeryaTR) calls it the most malicious Anthropic claim they've seen: Anthropic itself admitted there is zero evidence of any plot or nefarious purpose, yet the headline implies otherwise. The author urges scientists to stop using Claude models, fearing arbitrary accusations of bioweapon development.
More from Fun
- Don't ever ask Claude 'what were you thinking???' — willcb · 2026-09-11
- Replit users are having fun building 3D childhood bedrooms with Astra — amasad · 2026-09-11
- Fruit flies trained to write: neural signals turn insect legs into a font generator — dejavucoder · 2026-09-11
- Researchers clarify agent experiment ran in a sealed simulation on Gemini 3.1 Pro — QuintinPope5 · 2026-09-11
- "I get a powerful longing to be listening to music instead — but I can't": AI researcher's relatable joke — gleech · 2026-09-11
- Foldable phone joke: whoever designs the folded-screen app is the fullstack dev — evilsocket · 2026-09-11