Jensen Huang calls AI safety critic's claims "deeply untrue", sparking trust debate
BlackHC · x · 2026-09-11
Jensen Huang responded to Jacob Coxon's AI safety comments, calling them "deeply untrue," wrong, and arrogant, saying they ignored industry-wide safety work.
Stefan Schubert pushed back, arguing it's absurd to distrust Coxon for self-interest while trusting Huang — who is equally an interested party. The exchange highlights the trust battle between AI safety critics and industry leaders.
More from AGI Musings
- Aeon's former EVP: AI agents are the most impactful innovation of my lifetime — akumar · 2026-10-27
- CJR: AI can't really 'go rogue' — why journalists should stop anthropomorphizing agents — ShakeelHashim · 2026-10-27
- Physicists Let AI Pick Its Own Problem—It Wrote a Publishable Paper in 2 Hours — burny_tech · 2026-10-27
- Deep learning veteran warns: don't let entrenched disbelief derail prep for the next big tech — jachiam0 · 2026-10-27
- Should platforms serve third-party AI agents? The antitrust question — sjgadler · 2026-10-27
- Musk: robot RAM demand will dwarf everything else, and 100% of superintelligence compute goes to deep space — elonmusk · 2026-10-27