Jensen Huang calls AI safety critic's claims "deeply untrue", sparking trust debate
BlackHC · x · 2026-09-11
Jensen Huang responded to Jacob Coxon's AI safety comments, calling them "deeply untrue," wrong, and arrogant, saying they ignored industry-wide safety work.
Stefan Schubert pushed back, arguing it's absurd to distrust Coxon for self-interest while trusting Huang — who is equally an interested party. The exchange highlights the trust battle between AI safety critics and industry leaders.
More from AGI Musings
- Most of the $94B flowing to neolabs is state and sovereign fund money, not VC — WhatTheLJW · 2026-09-11
- Katja Grace: doom isn't a utopia trade-off — utopia is a destination, doom is bad directions — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-11
- AI safety verification research should target commitments in frontier safety frameworks, researchers argue — HaydnBelfield · 2026-09-11
- kalomaze: Exploiting datacenter NIMBY anger for AI x-risk messaging is a classic alliance blunder — kalomaze · 2026-09-11
- OpenAI pulls out of Caltech math hackathon after mathematicians' open letter slams AI math 'slop' — exophades · 2026-09-11
- Peter Diamandis: The AI race is becoming the biggest construction project of our generation — PeterDiamandis · 2026-09-11