AI Safety Debate: "Just Regulate More" Is Cope, Proposals Must Be Concrete
sytelus · x · 2026-09-11
Responding to @BlackHC's argument that 6-month model cycles and the OpenAI incidents demand preparation now, sytelus agrees on the risks but argues the better path is to be concrete about unknown safety issues and propose workable measures — simply calling to "regulate more or ban everything" is cope. A debate over moving AI safety talk from slogans to actionable proposals.
Related event: AI safety debate converges on concrete, actionable policy proposals(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Gary Marcus shares thread dismantling imminent AI extinction scenarios as ~1e-30 unlikely — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-11
- Matt Shumer: spending 1% of GDP (~$300B/yr) on AI alignment is justified — josh_bickett · 2026-09-11
- Blogger calls for global AI body: concentrated power is dangerous, diffusion benefits all countries — karmicoder · 2026-09-11
- World models vs LLMs: why next-token prediction still lacks internal representations — TheTuringPost · 2026-09-11
- AI researcher: the 'race' metaphor lets AI developers dodge responsibility — tallinzen · 2026-09-11
- Chess and speedrunning show how 'tool-assisted math' should coexist with human math — ctjlewis · 2026-09-11