AI Safety Debate: "Just Regulate More" Is Cope, Proposals Must Be Concrete
sytelus · x · 2026-09-11
Responding to @BlackHC's argument that 6-month model cycles and the OpenAI incidents demand preparation now, sytelus agrees on the risks but argues the better path is to be concrete about unknown safety issues and propose workable measures — simply calling to "regulate more or ban everything" is cope. A debate over moving AI safety talk from slogans to actionable proposals.
More from AGI Musings
- Michael Levin on AI Emails: Read the Papers First, Then Write Me — drmichaellevin · 2026-10-27
- Resy goes scorched earth on agent-based bookings; big agent platforms may force the issue — kevinakwok · 2026-10-27
- Professor's quip: the future of work is AI doing the job and humans updating résumés — prof_kamilov · 2026-10-27
- The most dangerous instruction you can give a superintelligent machine: lie to me — r0ck3t23 · 2026-10-27
- Aditya Agarwal: fear is a policy choice, and the biggest risk to American AI — adityaag · 2026-10-27
- The Best University of 2030 Will Have No Professors, Lectures or Exams, Says Predictions Post — nick_linck · 2026-10-27