Could the US and China agree to slow AI? A tracker compiles all government statements
NathanpmYoung · x · 2026-09-11
Nathan Young shared a Spilled Ink resource page asking whether the US and China could agree to slow frontier AI. The page compiles statements, documents, and events from both governments on the possibility of slowing advanced AI, with filtering by speaker or kind, community voting, and an AI chat grounded in selected quotes.
The author pushes back on the common claim that China won't slow down: comparing the two governments' public statements, that's not how it looks to him, and he is soliciting additional claims to add to the record.
More from AGI Musings
- Ex-Anthropic staffer warns AI is 'gambling with our lives' on CNN; critics say whistleblower offered no specifics — nptacek · 2026-09-11
- Gary Marcus shares thread dismantling imminent AI extinction scenarios as ~1e-30 unlikely — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-11
- Matt Shumer: spending 1% of GDP (~$300B/yr) on AI alignment is justified — josh_bickett · 2026-09-11
- Blogger calls for global AI body: concentrated power is dangerous, diffusion benefits all countries — karmicoder · 2026-09-11
- World models vs LLMs: why next-token prediction still lacks internal representations — TheTuringPost · 2026-09-11
- AI researcher: the 'race' metaphor lets AI developers dodge responsibility — tallinzen · 2026-09-11