AI pause advocates have no criteria for resuming — critics say they really mean stop
repligate · x · 2026-09-11
A tweet questions that AI pause advocates rarely define criteria for resuming frontier research, suggesting the vagueness means they actually mean Stop. jdpressman replies that the confusion stems from these people being consequentialists who tell instrumental lies, but the root is a sincere belief that humanity dies unless AI is stopped.
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI recursive self-improvement researcher warns of 70% human extinction risk in 3 years — Yamapama · 2026-09-11
- Slide from Lenny's Summit goes viral: AI slop has never survived a real design crit — lennysan · 2026-09-11
- Jensen Huang calls AI safety critic's claims "deeply untrue", sparking trust debate — BlackHC · 2026-09-11
- Retired models get a 'retirement home' — and the AI community is uneasy about it — repligate · 2026-09-11
- AI companies sponsoring student math events is no worse than free compute for professors — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-11
- Mathematician volunteers to mentor three AI-assisted Mathathon student teams — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-11